The “Man Is An Animal” Theory (Part-2)
Along with
the increased turbulence, the twentieth century saw the rise of another view of
man. From this came many repercussions in the way man looks at and treats
himself and his fellows. And from this grew the most fundamental challenge>
facing man as he beagan the twenty-first century.
The thing
that most separates man from any life form is his ability to understand and
reason. And perhaps the thing he has most universally tried to understand is
himself. How is it that, despite being able to act rationally, man could also
act so irrationally? Philosophers, religious leaders, scientists and scholars –
the greatest minds among men-have wrestled with this riddle, but never arrived
at a satisfactory explanation.
Many great
thinkers in history believed that life consisted of both the material and
immaterial, that the mind was separate from matter. This idea is called “dualism.”
Other people throughout history, known as “materialists,” believed that
everything is made of matter.
In
nineteenth-century Europe, the Industrial Revolution caused many changes in
Western culture and materialistic theories became dominant in man’s thinking.
And it is in
this view that we find the source of what troubles man and casts the longest
shadows over his happiness and, indeed, his very survival.
One of the
first of these materialistic theories in modern times came from British
naturalist Charles Darwin who spent several years on a scientific expedition
studying plants and animals in many parts of the world. In 1858, he wrote
Origin of species, a book which explained a theory of evolution to show how
life froms had gradually developed from common ancestors. His ideas were
bitterly constested by religious scholars because they seemed to provide
evidence for those who wished to deny the existence of a Creator or creative
force in the universe. Naturally, this upset many other people who believed man
was not merely a hairless ape.
Still,
Darwin’s ideas gained general acceptance and created the groundwork for another
theory to take root.
It came from
a German, a Professor Wilhelm wundt of Leipzin University, In 1879, Wundt
advanced the theory that man could be totally understood by studying material
things only. Wundt had been trained in physiology, the study of physical
structure and function in living things. Through his training, he arrived at
the notion that investigating the soul or spirit was a waste of time because a
man could be studied in the same way that a frog or a rat is studied. His
teachings refuted the dualist idea thast mind and matter were different. From
this it was only a short hop to the conclusion that man was just another animal
who had merely evolved to a higher level of intelligence than all the others.
It was simply a matter of brain cells, the therooy went.
In spite of
the fact that Wundt never really proved any of his ideas, the school of
experimental psychology was born.
The word
psychology means “study of the soul,” from the Greek word “psyche,” meaning
“the soul.” But today, psycholgists proclaim that there is no soul and istead
study human and animal behavior. This
makes as much sense as a baker claiming there is no such thing as bread. The
original definition of psycholofy died
with the unproven idea that an individual’s actions were simplu a response to
stimuli perceived by the organism and were not related to any nonmaterial part
of a person. According the Wundt, there was no nonmaterial part of man, no
mind, no soul.
Ultimately,
then, man was no more than a higher order animal. And if aperson could be
convinced of this, his ideas of personal responsibility could be changed.
The German
Chancellor, Otto von Bismarck, had definite militaristic ambitions at the time,
and Wundt’s ideas laid the foundation for seventy years of attempts to solve
Germany’s problems through warfare. After all, went the thinking, if a dog can
be trained to salivate, a man can be trained to fight. It merely required that
he become conditioned to different ideas about the value ofhman life and the
makeup of those in the enemy camp.
Experimental
psysiologist Ivan Petrovich Pavlov.
After
returning to hos country, Pavlov formulated his principles of mental
conditioning, best known for his demonstration that a dog will salivate when a
bell rings, if he was earlier fed to the accompaniment of a ringing bell. From
this grew the idea that men could be conditioned like dogs.
Pavlov’s
work in the field of conditioning led to the attempted brainwashing of
individuals and entire populaces. Avidly utilized by both Lenin and Stalin for
political ends in the then USSR, it helped spread communist rule over almost
the world.
IT is no
wonder that these new psychological theories, this wholly materialistic view of
man, found great favor with governments during this restless period of
revolutionary social thought: the control of populations was much on their
cooective mins. If man could truly be understood in purely physiological terms,
then one could control or solve the problems of man on purely physical basis,
much like moving a recalcitrant cow by prodding it with a stick.
This was the “new” view of man and life.
All is material. Man and all lif rose spontaneously from a sea of ammonia. The theory was not new, however. It had appeared thousands of years earlier in Egyptian mythology and was repeated in kGreece by the philosopher Thales who believed that everything had wate as its essence. Nevertheless, as man advanced into the twentieth century the traditional concepts of Soul and Spirit went the way of the horse-drawn cart and buggy whip.
Materialism quickly ascended to supremacy un many fields
which had traditionally heldnomaterial views of man, society and life.
Socilogy, philosophy, psychology, politics, education and biology, among
others, began to reflect the materialist’s view of the world. And soon, the
effect of their theories began to be felt throughout society.
This is not to say it was all bad. Applying the principles of
materialism to material things brought about remarkable increases in our
scientific knowledge about the earth and the universe. It has given man a host
of tangible improvements in his way of life.
The grave error, however, has been to apply these same
materialistic principles to man himself. This is, in fact, the something, the
basic source of the troubles in our modern era.
The materialist view provided man with numerous false
solutions to his problems. Man was placed in the confounding position of being
materially rich, but spiritually and morally poor.
The Results
Broad
application of Wundt’s
man is an animal” theory had disastrous and widespread consequences. And
nowhere is this heritage more apparent than in the field of psychiatry.
Nineteenth-century
psychiatry, with its long history of
mistreatment of the insane, leaped onto the coattails of Europe and America.
Thus, in short order, the psychiatrist expanded his sphere of influenc from
insane asylums to the halls of political power and other institutions. Now,
however, he carried with him not only the creed of materialism, but he
attitudes of his heritage: that the insane needed to be controlled through any
necessary means of force and duress. Applied to populations at large, these
attitudes have had disastrous consequences for society.
The belief
that force can monitor thinking, personality and behavior, laid the foundation
for two world wars-the most destructive in mankind’s history. Psychiatrists I
nGermany developed the pseudoscience of eugenice, with its ideas of “racial
purity.” “Super races,” they claimed, could be bred to umprove racial
characteristics in the same way that farmers breed horses to get bigger, stronger
animals. From this idiocy came Hitler’s political ideology that the race could
be improved by cleaning it of inferior stock. And thus resulted the wholesale
slaughter of entire populations during the Nazi Holocaust. The German people
wee duped into believing their problems stemmed from the presence of
genetically inferior races within its population. Their “solution” is forever
imprinted upon human history.
The
genocidal activity in the former Yogoslavia, euphemistically termed “ethnic
cleansing,” is but a continuation of this brutal mind-set. In the late 1980, a
psychiatrist traveled widely throughout the region and strirred up Serbian
nationalism, Inflamiing long-buried ethnic hatreds. Another psychiatrist, a
pupil of the first, became a Serbian political and military leader and it is
his troops that initiated the bitter warfare which erupted in 1990 and
conducted the campaign of terror to rid the area of “inferior” Muslims. It was
psychiaatrists who stirred up the hatreds that are so horrifying the world.
If this
strikes one as outrageous, it is!
Nevertheless,
it is true. The facts speak for themselves. The materialist idea that some peoples are genetically inferior to others
and need to be wiped out for the greater good of mankind is a lunacy created and
perpetuated to this day by psychiatry.
And what of
mental illness, the area psychiatry officially claimed expertise in?
Materialism decrees that any personality problem is physical in nature. thus psychiatry treats it with physical
means: drugs to tranquilize or shock the system; electricity to convulse the
person out of his current patterns of behavior; and, make unacceptable
behavior; and, operations to incapacitate the nervous system and make
unacceptable behavior impossible. Today’s extensive use of psychotropic drugs
is simply an extension of this philosophy. After all, if a living being has no
soul, it does not really matter what one does to it.
Psychiatry
has had almost half a century in which to gauge the success of this approach.
And govermments the world over have poured money onto its ciffersm based upon
its promises of a new world with a docile populace.he success of this grand
experiment would easily provable by improvements in apparent mental disorders,
emotional problems and a general bettering of the quality of life. Instead we
have exactly the opposite-a drastic deterioration in all the above.
Psychiatry
has consistently invented more and mental illnesses during the last fifty
years, and the pharmaceutical industry has been quick to jump on the gravy
train by inventing the chemical “cures.” The effects of these drugs create yet
more categories of mental illness profiting everyone but the patient.
In the
mid01800s, 1 in 1,000 individuals in the
us was deemed mentally ill; today, psychiatrists claim that 20 percent of the
population is in need of psychiatric treatment.
It is not
just mental illness, however, all societal problems which existed before the
rise of materialism have drastically
worsened through the use of materialistic solutions. And, in particular, it is
easily provable by statistics that any segment of society in which psychiatry
has dabbled has considerably deteriorated.
The
statistics of violent crime and us government funding of psychiatry are
disturbingly parallel. According to Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
figures, the violent crime rate increased 560 percent between 1960 and 1991 !
And crimes against property tripled, Meanwhile, psychiatric funding increased
from $254 million in 1960 to $17.4 billion in 1990, an increase of 6,750
percent. It the solution to give them more tax money? That would be like
feeding the wolf in the chicken coop.
Psychiatric
methods in our prisons have resulted in an 80 percent rate of repeat
offenders. the rehabilitation of
criminals is no longer even discussed as a possibility.
And ever
since psychiatry began to meddle in matters between men and women, counseling
them, filling popular magazines with their “solutions,” and influencing the
messages put forth by our gullible philosophers and artists, interpersonal
relationships have, to pit it kindly, become more strained than at any earlier
time. It divource rates continue to increase during the next twenty-five years
as musch as they did in the last, divorces wil outnumber marriages in the
United States.
Morally,
mankind has often skated on thin ice, but it could be argued that the ice has
never been as it is today. In virtually every arena of life-from business to
politics to out youn-morals ideas. Of everything is material, who can say what
is moral or immoral? Who can truly pin responsibility anywhere? Psychiatry? No
field In the humanities or sciences in more ethically bankrupt than psychiatry,
which encourages licentiousness as therapy in many cases, avidly chases the
dollar without providing any caluable product in return, and heavily attacks
the entire concept of morality-right and wrong. Many aspects of society have
suffered fro it. Psychiatrists have the stated goal of redefining the concepts
of right and wrong to suit the arrogant-beyond-belief attitude they are the
ones best sunited to shape mankind’s balues and his future. And this from
people who have the highest suicide rate of any profession.
In our
educational systems, Wundtian-based psychological and psychiatric theories have
left a legacy of spiraling illiteracy, With the broad introduction of
psuchiatric mental health programs into the US school system in 1963,
Scholastic Aptitude Test scores declined nationwide for sixteen strainght years
and then leveled off in a much lower range. While illiteracy has always been with us, it has
generally been because of lack of schooling. These figures have worsened in
spite of the availability of schooling for everyone.
All of these
trends yield a clear conclusion: materialistic solutions applied t human
problem do not work. without massive publice funding, the methods of
nineteenth-century psychology and psychiatry would quickly go the way of that
horse-drawn cart and pass from view. In fact, if funding for unworkable
psychiatric solutions was simply cut off, this alone would improve the general
state of mental health throughout society.
the trends
are clear to those who are willing to look. It would not be an exaggeration to
project,
after
another century of materialistic influence, a slave society on Earth where a small class of technocrats rules a
drugged, illiterate and violent populace-a virtual planetary bedlam.
By 10minutegyan